Github actions push to branch yml): cd b. I have a GitHub Action workflow to create a new version and publish after merge to our master branch . 1, v1. No need for passphrases etc. Navigation Menu Toggle navigation. workflow example If you take a look at the documentation here you will see that the GITHUB_SHA associated with the on: schedule event is "Last commit on default branch. Sorta makes sense, but still a PITA. However, master branch has a protection. My github actions workflow is supposed to check for certain mandatory files within that repo and if that is not found, create them and add that to that developer's repo. Push into protected branches" Installation. What I'm doing wrong? Here's my Github action : Github Push Commit in Github Actions to a Protected Branch - github-actions-push-to-protected-branch. I haven't played around with GH actions (and that one in particular) to know how it works internally. This GitHub action simplifies the process of force pushing an orphan branch to your GitHub repository. Now we have an action for the Release notes, which creates a Pull Request with the actual release notes when pushing to staging or master. I trigger a CI build action on pull_request: created. It ensures that your jobs only run if the following conditions are met: This is a documented limitation for all GH actions: An action in a workflow run can't trigger a new workflow run. 😉 Hi Stummi, Glad to hear you in GitHub Community! If an action pushes code using the repository’s GITHUB_TOKEN, a new workflow will not run even when the repository contains a workflow configured to run when push events occur. *'] pull_request: branches: [develop] paths: ['**/pg. When a commit is pushed to the master branch, it automatically triggers a deployment to the staging environment. sed -i 's/name:abc/name:xyz/g' sam. Now, it seems like I don't even need to have the action on the main branch, is that correct? It seems like "pull request" but actually is "git push -f origin dist-branch". yml. - main permissions: From another answer I know how to run an action if an update is pushed to (a specific path in) a certain branch. git config --global user. code-R asked this question in Actions. user_name: The GitHub username associated with the API token secret. Branch Tag Action Branch Tag Action. The answer also implies how to run an action on any update in a specific branch. That action uses process. Required The branch name of the branch to commit and push to. push: branches: - master. Outputs. I have a workflow configuration like this one: on: push: branches: - master - feature - experimental and I would like checkout@v2 to work with all branches. You might find a good compromise by using branches-ignore and types. AFAIK, from git perspective, the tag has nothing with the branch but it's a pointer to a message - Automatically updated using GitHub Actions; branch - defaults to the branch that triggered the action, so if you pushed to master, the branch is master; files - . 15. For example here is a custom title for each scenario: :octocat: Github action to retrieve branch or tag names with support for all events. You might want to use this to, for example, track an up-to-date set of files generated by your action, but making them more easily accessible than if you used artifacts. Sync on: push: branches: - main jobs: sync-branches: Is it possible to restrict a GitHub Actions workflow to certain users? Our current workaround is to use a protected branch, allowing workflows to trigger off of a push to that branch. Now, I'm not 100% sure about branches: and tags:, but for the purposes of the answer here, the statement @shkhaliq,. Here is the code: name: check-compile on: push: branches: - dev - name: commit changed files run: git commit -m "Auto adding config files" - name: fetch from master run: git fetch origin master - name: push code to master run: git push origin HEAD:master # deploys latest version to s3: deploy: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: uses: actions/checkout@v1 - name: Deploy static site to S3 bucket run: aws s3 sync Suppose you have created a new branch on GitHub with the name feature-branch. git git init git add . , v1. GITHUB_REF, and is the equivalent of this solution: export GIT_BRANCH=$ Just found that you can use GitHub deploy keys:. git would fail with fatal: destination path 'xx' already exists and is not an empty directory. GitHub Action to, upon successful merge, open a pull request to sync the updated branch back to one or more other branches. email "[email protected]" git config --local user. branchprefix_4269555185-1: temp: false: commit_message Push to "status check"-protected branches. Recently, I explored GitHub Actions and experimented with a particular scenario involving two repositories: Repository A and Repository B. I've also tried using actions/github-script@v5 but also had no luck. destination_branch_create: Github Action to Cherry Pick commits from a branch (generally, master) and create a PR on another branch (Release branch). env: BRANCH_NAME: ${{ github. destination_branch_create: [optional] The branch the changes should be pushed to; defaults to commiting to destination_branch; is useful for creating PRs We have a branch model with feature branches, develop, staging (for testing) and master for release. . No more parsing etc. Copy and paste the following snippet into your . Using your browser, open the GitHub repository The problem is that it is not possible to filter a tag event pushed to a particular branch which means, every push-tag event regardless of the branch, trigger the release pipeline, which might be a bit messy in case of a tag pushed to dev or any other non-release branch,. md. Then I open a PR into develop. Example: name: Trigger Jenkins Build [ Build-Portal ] on: push: branches: [ develop ] paths: - 'frontend/**' - 'backend/**' types: [closed] jobs: build: name: Triggering Summary. created from the context. GitHub Actions can't push to protected branches. for example if my name is Tom and I merged 'test' branch to master, I will be able to get 'Tom' and 'test' as values on the workflow that starts on push (right after the pull request). You'll need to create a personal access token and store it as a secret. As of now (Feb, 2021) GitHub actions do support this behavior by default. Why might that be the case? I should note that the Workflow file lives in the 'main' branch, not the 'translation-files' branch it should be reacting to. ref_name }} Explanation. That's not the same thing, as that's specifically about getting the branch name from the env variable GITHUB_REF. ref has the simple branch name. git_user_name: The name of the git user of the commit: Commit and Push to Protected Branch Action: false: git_user_email: The email of the git user of the commit <> false: temp_branch_prefix: The prefix of the temporary branch. When prompted about committing and pushing your local changes to start a new GitHub Actions run, specify y. Overrides destination branch from source branch. Note: Currently this action only supports status checks that are GitHub Action status checks, i. Skip to content. This is a known problem (Workflow files only picked up from master?). empty. Defaults to the tracked remote branch. This is what I tried :-git config --local user. By using branch filters and job dependencies, you can ensure that tests run across all branches while deployments are restricted to the main branch or other specific branches. - name: Push to a protected branch. Yes-base_branch I want to run an action to check if my code compiles whenever I push to dev branch. email "devopssameera@gmail. So I wrote. , no third-party on push and on pull_request difference in github actions? In general, push will trigger when you push code where pull_request will trigger when there is a pull request. This configuration helps maintain code quality and stability, making your This PR will move changelog updates to PRs because of branch protection. - uses: When a push is initiated in the GitHub repository, an event is generated by GitHub, containing information about the branch, commits, and other details. 2 BUILD_TYPE A merged PR to the develop branch will always trigger the push event, which executes your GitHub actions file's jobs accordingly. This GitHub Action will take any subdirectory in your repository, and push it as the contents of a git branch to a repository and branch of your choosing, either over SSH or to the current repo. dwa-bot. Push to a protected branch Push to a protected branch. It should belong to a user with write/maintain permissions to the repository. md), during the GitHub Actions flow it executes build. Optionnally creates a new commit and pushes changes. com" git config --global The GitHub Actions for pushing local changes to GitHub using an authorized GitHub token. ref. Sync branches. VALIDATE. destination_branch: [optional] The branch of the destination repo to base the changes on and push to (defaults to master). on: pull_request: branches: - main types: [closed] jobs: my Is there any smart way to determine the default branch in GitHub actions? Now I need to write something like: on: push: branches: - master is there a way to write something like the code message - Automatically updated using GitHub Actions; branch - defaults to the branch that triggered the action, so if you pushed to master, the branch is master; files - . It’s too bad GitHub Actions doesn’t seem to provide a true wildcard pattern. The workflow will run for any pull request opened and show your workflows directly in the pull request. Which makes sense. By design it deletes the files from the destination directory as it is meant to "publish" a set generated files. I created an action to help to achieve it but require some prerequisite. For example, if an action pushes code using the repository's GITHUB_TOKEN, a new workflow will not run even when the repository contains a workflow configured to run when push events occur. Supply the requested GitHub information. In the left sidebar, I’m using Github Actions to auto approve and merge pull requests. So this seems like a Catch-22: when I push a branch, I can't see the tag, when I push a tag, I can't see the branch. name "GitHub Action" git add -A git commit -m "Added files" git push You should not specify a branch name, then, in order for your action to run on push for all branches: on: [push] Then you can use EthanSK/git-branch-name-action in order to get the current branch name. This configuration dictates that the workflow should But what if I want to restrict runs to pull requests opened against specific base refs, while allowing runs on all branches? I thought about this: on: push: branches: - "*" pull_request: branches: - "develop" - "staging" But it didn't work. remote: error: GH006: Protected branch update failed for refs/heads/master. That means GitHub servers (where the GitHub action/workflow is executed) must be able to see and Pushing to PR protected branch with token obtained from this action. cat sam. sh and the output/ directory (configurable via source-directory appears in the output repository. [push] jobs: print_branch_tag: runs-on: ubuntu-latest name: A job to print branch tag steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v2 While there is no specific merged type for pull requests, there is however a merged flag on the API response. TRUE when the action did not perform anything. remote is internet-facing (as opposed to on-premise only, behind a DMZ). This allows you to run actions only on merges, rather than all pushes to the target branch. - tj-actions/branch-names For the first question, how to get source branch name on push action on master? Github action does not provide the way so far. my goal is: In repoA, checkout from repoB do some work, generate some files commit change push to a new branch in repoB and create pull request in repoB can this be done? I have a GitHub Actions workflow configured for my master branch. e. Navigation Menu Sync on: push: branches: # Change this to whatever branch you want this action to trigger on. Let’s delve into the folder GitHub Action Branch Tag Action. Repository pandoc-test contains Markdown and a Git Action to generate, using Pandoc, an output: HTML, PDF, odt, epub, etc. This action need to run on main or any (or any merging target branch) user_name: The GitHub username associated with the API token secret. tag_name: the name pattern of the new tag; tag_message: the message pattern of the new tag; create_tag: whether to In my Github Action, I need to clone another repo on the same branch as the one that triggered the workflow. It also must have "repository" and "workflow" scopes so it can push to repository and edit workflows. on: push: branches: [develop] paths: ['**/pg. By default, bots can't sign commits. AFAIK, from git perspective, the tag has nothing with the branch but it's a pointer to a I ended up having only "push" event. I added this Action to a feature branch and GitHub didn't pick it up. GitHub Action Push changes. And if it was a pull request from the feature/xxx-yyy branch, I need to symmetrically clone the remote repo on the feature/xxx-yyy branch. Flow: The example repository has a MarkDown file main. Here's an example workflow that syncs a test branch every time a commit is pushed to the main branch: name: Sync branch on: push: branches: - main github_token: Token used to authenticate with the GitHub API. 2), it triggers a deployment to the production @Florian Confirmed behaviour: top-level triggers are OR, so if you have on: and then both schedule: and push:, either will trigger the workflow. How to trigger github action ci for tags and branch push #48858. Answered by jge162. the same repository) on: pull_request: push: { branches: [master] } Explicit syntax: on: pull_request: {} push: { branches: [master] } Extendable syntax: on: pull_request: push: branches: - master When using a version control system the latter may be most useful as diff viewers can always easily distinguish* between different lines. 0. outputs. pub one) as a deploy key at Your repo -> Settings -> Security -> Deploy GitHub Action to keep a branch in sync with the current branch. 0 Latest version. Fail the action in case there is nothing to do. Reload to refresh your session. TL;DR. (meaning all files in the whole tree) repository - you can specify the repository to push the code to, default is origin (e. The complete name will be prefix_runid-runattempt: i. – GitHub action that will commit the result to an input branch - Automattic/action-commit-to-branch. Your scenario would require custom conditions. Get branch tag and set to ENV. (meaning all files in the whole tree) repository - you Used to push generated files from a directory from Git Action step into another repository on Github. For example, I generally GitHub Action: Generate a build and push to another branch - publish. So if that was a push to master, then I need to clone the remote repo on the master branch. This wasn't a good example since in the delete event, github. If you also use the paths-filter action you can get to the result you want with something like this:. FETCH. Anytime you create a new branch or tag, the workflow will be triggered as long as the workflow runs on create event has been existing on the base I have created on my main branch with. You could use this for example to: Publishing a subdirectory to a repo's gh-pages branch, after optionally running a build step. I've tried using hub but can't seem to get it to work. I wasn’t able to allow github-actions[bot] to push to a protected branch using the settings page though, so I ended up using Branch filtering in GitHub Actions is configured using the branches keyword within the on field of your workflow YAML file. " This is what will be checked out by default when you use the actions/checkout action. v1 Latest version. Push commit(s) to a branch protected by required status checks by creating a temporary branch, where status checks are run, before fast-forward merging it into the protected It is also useful if using GitHub Actions you generate certain files that you want to push to another GitHub repository. 1. The various ways the GitHub action workflow can be configured to run — name: Example Workflow on: push: # Triggered on any push to the repository branches: - main When the action is triggered by a push on tags, github. The solution that worked for me was to use a different token on checkout. Below is the GitHub Actions workflow file (sam. I am trying to figure out what the syntax would be for running a workflow, on push, on any branch but master. code-R Mar 1, 2023 · 3 comments · 11 The problem is that it is not possible to filter a tag event pushed to a particular branch which means, every push-tag event regardless of the branch, trigger the release pipeline, which might be a bit messy in case of a tag pushed to dev or any other non-release branch,. git checkout -b feature-branch. The create event does not support branch filter and tag filter. event. head_ref is only set Github Actions on push not master. Most of the projects have Release branches and master branch. We want to be able to make a package. env. You can simply copy the branch name from the output of branch -a command above. However, I want to configure it so that if a commit in the master branch is tagged with a version (e. I would like a GitHub action to kick off on a push or pull request to a specific branch or if it matches a path in any branch. Add public key (. E. According to the github action documentation, it should work in the same workflow using multiple paths. For that, I needed to create that same action file on test. They overlap when you create PRs from the same repo, but you need pull_request if you want to run an action when you receive a PR from a fork for example. Suggestions: Create a bot user and give it write access to the repos. If the branch I have a CI workflow that runs on PR and PUSH to main branch. 3. g push or pull_request):. Github actions supports triggering a build when a pull request is created pointing to a specified branch or on a push to a wildcard branch. I can't make this work. Installation. remote: error: You're not authorized to push to this branch. The content of sam. push: branches: Thanks for updating. head_ref || github. git pull --all Pull all remote branches git branch -a List all branches now Checkout and switch to the feature-branch directory. When I try the push command from my machine with the access token it works without an issue. Follow these steps to set up the necessary permissions: Navigate to your repository on GitHub. I want to be able to let an action run on any given branch except master. v1. token These inputs are optional: that means that if you don't enter them, default values will be used and it'll work just fine. In the terminal window, view the results of the azd pipeline config command. ref is something like refs/tags/xxx; when action is triggered by a push on branches, github. Use latest version. My question is about how to extract the branch name from github. 5. Generate SSH key pair: ssh-keygen -t ed25519. Within a trigger, like push:, the additional criteria for branches: and paths: are AND. g. You need push when you want to run Find the GitHub workflows. But since my actions are in main it never runs whenever I push to dev branch. Copy GitHub Action: Generate a build and push to another branch - publish. Push tags uses: ad-m/github-push-action@master with: github_token: ${{ steps. GitHub Action Push source branch to destination branch. on: push: branches: - '**' And whenever I need to know if it is a branch creation within my pipeline I use github. Option [3] The final option (and perhaps most reliable option, if done right) is the best of both worlds. git commit -m 'Auto Pushed From Action' git push --force master:<dist branch> main. # Ideally it should match the "FROM_BRANCH" setting below. The azd pipeline config command will output the GitHub repository name for your project. But if I was in a different event, how would I drop the prefix refs/heads I am new to github actions, I have a good idea on how they work but I am having troubles creating releases for multiple branches. *'] But it only executes for pushes (or PRs presumably) to the “develop” branch. I have tried to understand the documentation but it really isn't any help. Hello everyone, I have created a custom GithubApp to which I gave permission to bypass branch protection rules (Allow specified actors to bypass required pull requests). md initially contains name:abc, and my objective is to change abc to xyz from within GitHub Actions triggered from Repository A. Master branch is where developers works on but we want to push the changes to the Release branches too. This works for every trigger that you can specify under on (e. fail-if-empty. See: GitHub Actions: Skip pull request and push workflows with [skip ci] GitHub Actions now supports skipping push and pull_request workflows by looking for some common keywords in your commit message. This event is then processed by The most common events are push and pull_request events to trigger workflow runs on any change to the main branch. All gists Back to GitHub Sign in Sign up By default, this action will clear the target branch of any pre-existing files, and only keep those that are defined in the target FOLDER when the action was run. All gists Back to GitHub Sign in Sign up Sign in Sign up You signed in with another tab or window. yml file. How can I fix it? GitHub Action to automatically open a pull request to sync the updated branch back to one or more other branches. Learn how to commit and push changes to the current branch from a GitHub Action workflow. I have a repository in GitHub and I want to create an Action to build a Docker image and push it to the Docker Hub. The trick is that github. steps: # the checkout action persists the passed credentials by default. There's no SLA on feature branch normally, meaning I can push broken code up to it all day long and no CI build should be triggered. This would allow one to do the following, assuming we want to run an action on any merge to the main branch:. This can now be overwritten by specifying a file with a custom list of globs to define which files should be deleted from the target branch before copying the new files over. Push changes Push changes. In Repository B, there exists a file named sam. All gists Back to GitHub Sign in Sign up Sign in Sign up push: branches: - master: jobs: build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest: name: Build and Push: steps: - name: git-checkout: uses: actions/checkout@v2 By default, this action will clear the target branch of any pre-existing files, and only keep those that are defined in the target FOLDER when the action was run. for the default cases. # subsequent git commands will pick them up automatically. actions/checkout#344 Branch protection rules currently require signed commits. Is it possible for the action to detect which branch the workflow is running on Adds all files by default 👨 Uses github. --- name: CI on: push: branches: - main pull_request: types: [opened, synchronize, reopened] I have another workflow I'd like to only run after CI is complete and conclusion is success but only when it's pushed to main branch. Configuring GitHub Actions to run jobs on specific branches can greatly streamline your CI/CD pipeline. Push source branch to destination branch Push source branch to destination branch. Since the awesome GitHub CLI allows using a separate, higher-permissions token named GH_TOKEN (since depending Say I have 2 branches, a feature branch and a develop branch. However every time I see this in the GitHub Action. on: push: branches: [ test ] I have noticed, that while I can trigger it manually, and it will work, it will not actually trigger if I push to test. either a push to any file/folder in branch A; or a push to a specific file in branch B GitHub Action Push to a protected branch. Push commit(s) to a branch protected by required status checks by creating a temporary branch, where status checks are run, before fast-forward merging it into the protected branch, finally removing the temporary branch. actor as the default author 🤖 Uses @github-actions[bot] as the default committer 🔼 Pushes changes to the current branch 🤩 Works great for the common use cases! A convenience wrapper with sensible defaults so that you don't have to do git add, git commit, and git push manually all the time. rm -rf . Let's say this build fails. ref is refs/heads/main. Is it possible to create multiple releases from multiple branches in a single workflow? "CI/CD" on: push: branches: [ main, example ] pull_request: branches: [ main, example ] env: QT_VERSION: 5. I read through some other posts here that looks like folks are having issues with I've created a Github action that is triggered when I push a code to the "staging" branch. Click on Settings located in the repository toolbar. If your repository's default branch is master (which in general is the case) this workflow will checkout the last commit on It turns out that you really can't just git push from your GitHub actions if the repository has branch protection turned on or required checks before merging. build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest. json command However, when the Weblate bot pushes changes to that very folder and branch the action does not kick in. 1 solution that was tested successfully was to create PAT with admin permission then use that instead of the generated token by GitHub Action with limited permission, uncheck the "include administrators Push to "status check"-protected branches. Github actions is obviously built around Github flow, and for that kind a flow it I want that a workflow that starts on push will print the origin (base) branch name and name of the one who did the push. here's an example of a wildcard feature branches, push vs pull_request trigger on: push: branches: - prod pull_request: branches: - main I was hoping to find a way to make the workflow re-run on my existing pull requests whenever I push to the prod branch. Usage. Don't get me wrong, this is a good answer in general - just asking in case others - like Note that this would assume mydomain. – wrymug. Next use I have set the repo so that I have push access to the master branch. The action runs the tests, and when successful, I'd like it to push the code from staging to the "prod" branch. I know how to do it, but if I create the action in a branch other than master, GitHub does not run it. However, what I would like is to trigger an update. So, if you have 2x uses: actions/checkout@v3, does that behave exactly as running git clone X twice? (e. Commented Sep 26, 2019 at 19:26. qas rzmvvj nup qopic vnqxag wfnwtoyq gntwawl dncwb bseah hew